advanced 12 min read
Physical sciences · Topic
Friedmann Equations and Cosmology
differential equations · dynamical systems
The Friedmann equations describe how the scale factor $a(t)$ of the universe evolves in response to its energy content. Derived from the Einstein field equations applied to the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, they connect the expansion rate $H = \dot{a}/a$ to density contributions from matter, radiation, and dark energy. Together with the continuity equation, they form a complete dynamical system that predicts the age, geometry, and ultimate fate of the universe.

FLRW Metric and Scale Factor

The Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric describes a spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe:

\[ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + a(t)^2 \left[\frac{dr^2}{1 - kr^2} + r^2 d\Omega^2\right]\]

where $a(t)$ is the dimensionless scale factor (normalized so $a_0 = a(t_0) = 1$ today), and $k \in {-1, 0, +1}$ is the curvature parameter:

  • $k = 0$: flat (Euclidean) spatial sections
  • $k = +1$: closed (spherical) geometry
  • $k = -1$: open (hyperbolic) geometry

The comoving coordinate $r$ labels points fixed to the cosmic expansion; proper distance is $d = a(t)\chi$ where $\chi$ is the comoving distance. The Hubble parameter is

\[H(t) = \frac{\dot{a}}{a}\]

with present value $H_0 \approx 70\ \text{km s}^{-1}\text{Mpc}^{-1}$.

Friedmann Equations

Inserting the FLRW metric into the Einstein field equations with a perfect fluid stress-energy tensor yields two equations:

First Friedmann equation (energy constraint):

\[H^2 = \left(\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\right)^2 = \frac{8\pi G}{3}\rho - \frac{kc^2}{a^2} + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}\]

Second Friedmann equation (acceleration equation):

\[\frac{\ddot{a}}{a} = -\frac{4\pi G}{3}\left(\rho + \frac{3P}{c^2}\right) + \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3}\]

The fluid (continuity) equation follows from $\nabla^\mu T_{\mu\nu} = 0$:

\[\dot{\rho} + 3H\left(\rho + \frac{P}{c^2}\right) = 0\]

This is not independent—it follows from differentiating the first Friedmann equation and using the second. The three equations involve three unknowns $(a, \rho, P)$, so an equation of state $P = w\rho c^2$ closes the system.

Equation of State and Density Evolution

Different components have different equations of state parameter $w$:

Component $w$ $\rho \propto$ $a$ dominates
Matter (cold) $0$ $a^{-3}$ $a \propto t^{2/3}$
Radiation $1/3$ $a^{-4}$ $a \propto t^{1/2}$
Cosmological constant ($\Lambda$) $-1$ $\text{const}$ $a \propto e^{H_\Lambda t}$
Curvature $-1/3$ $a^{-2}$ (sub-dominant today)
General dark energy $w \neq -1$ $a^{-3(1+w)}$

For each component with constant $w$, the fluid equation integrates to $\rho \propto a^{-3(1+w)}$. The dilution by $a^{-3}$ represents volume expansion; the additional factor $a^{-1}$ for radiation represents photon redshifting (energy per photon $\propto 1/a$).

The radiation energy density at temperature $T$:

\[\rho_r c^2 = g_* \frac{\pi^2}{30}\frac{(k_B T)^4}{(\hbar c)^3}\]

where $g_$ counts relativistic degrees of freedom ($g_ = 2$ for photons, $43/4$ in the early universe before neutrino decoupling).

Density Parameters and the Flat Universe

Define dimensionless density parameters relative to the critical density $\rho_c = 3H^2/8\pi G$:

\[\Omega_i = \frac{\rho_i}{\rho_c}, \quad \Omega_\Lambda = \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3H^2}, \quad \Omega_k = -\frac{kc^2}{a^2 H^2}\]

The first Friedmann equation becomes simply:

\[\Omega_m + \Omega_r + \Omega_\Lambda + \Omega_k = 1\]

The critical density today:

\[\rho_{c,0} = \frac{3H_0^2}{8\pi G} \approx 9.47 \times 10^{-30}\ \text{g cm}^{-3} \approx 5.4\ \text{GeV m}^{-3}\]
CMB measurements indicate $ \Omega_k < 0.002$—the universe is spatially flat to $0.2\%$ precision, consistent with inflationary predictions. The concordance $\Lambda$CDM values:
Parameter Symbol Value
Total matter $\Omega_m$ $0.315$
Dark matter $\Omega_c$ $0.265$
Baryons $\Omega_b$ $0.049$
Radiation $\Omega_r$ $9.3 \times 10^{-5}$
Dark energy $\Omega_\Lambda$ $0.685$
Curvature $\Omega_k$ $\approx 0$

Cosmic Eras and the Scale Factor

The Hubble parameter evolves as

\[E(z) \equiv \frac{H(z)}{H_0} = \sqrt{\Omega_{r,0}(1+z)^4 + \Omega_{m,0}(1+z)^3 + \Omega_{k,0}(1+z)^2 + \Omega_{\Lambda,0}}\]

Key transitions in cosmic history:

Matter-radiation equality ($z_\text{eq} \approx 3400$): $\rho_m = \rho_r$. Before this, radiation dominates; after, matter.

Recombination ($z \approx 1100$): hydrogen forms, photons decouple (CMB).

Matter-Lambda equality ($z_\Lambda \approx 0.3$): $\rho_m = \rho_\Lambda$. Expansion begins accelerating.

The deceleration parameter:

\[q = -\frac{\ddot{a} a}{\dot{a}^2} = \frac{\Omega_m}{2} + \Omega_r - \Omega_\Lambda\]

$q < 0$ indicates accelerated expansion. Today, $q_0 \approx -0.53$; the transition from deceleration to acceleration occurred at $z_\text{acc} \approx 0.64$ ($\sim 7.7\ \text{Gyr}$ ago).

Analytic solutions for single-component dominated universes:

\[a(t) \propto \begin{cases} t^{1/2} & \text{radiation domination} \\ t^{2/3} & \text{matter domination} \\ e^{H_\Lambda t} & \text{$\Lambda$ domination, } H_\Lambda = \sqrt{\Lambda/3} \end{cases}\]

Age of the Universe

The age of the universe is

\[t_0 = \int_0^1 \frac{da}{a H(a)} = \frac{1}{H_0}\int_0^\infty \frac{dz}{(1+z)E(z)}\]

For flat $\Lambda$CDM with $\Omega_m = 0.315$, $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.685$, $H_0 = 67.4\ \text{km/s/Mpc}$:

\[t_0 \approx 13.8\ \text{Gyr}\]

The integrand is dominated by the low-redshift era. A matter-only ($\Omega_m = 1$, $\Omega_\Lambda = 0$) universe would give $t_0 = 2/(3H_0) \approx 9.3\ \text{Gyr}$—embarrassingly less than the age of the oldest globular clusters ($\sim 12$–$13\ \text{Gyr}$), which historically motivated introducing $\Lambda$.

The horizon distance (maximum causal distance):

\[d_H = c\int_0^{t_0} \frac{dt}{a(t)} = \frac{c}{H_0}\int_0^\infty \frac{dz}{E(z)} \approx 46{,}500\ \text{Mpc}\]

This is the comoving radius of the observable universe.

Dark Energy and the Fate of the Universe

The cosmological constant is equivalent to a fluid with equation of state $w = -1$ and constant energy density. More generally, dynamic dark energy has $w(z) = w_0 + w_a(1 - a)$ (Chevallier-Polarski-Linder parameterization):

\[\Omega_\text{DE}(a) = \Omega_{\text{DE},0}\, a^{-3(1+w_0+w_a)}\exp\!\left[-3w_a(1-a)\right]\]

Current constraints from CMB + BAO + SNe Ia: $w_0 = -0.95 \pm 0.08$, consistent with $\Lambda$ ($w = -1$).

The ultimate fate depends on $w$:

Dark energy Fate Timescale
$\Lambda$ ($w=-1$) de Sitter expansion $\infty$ (asymptotic)
Phantom ($w < -1$) Big Rip (all structures torn apart) Finite $t_\text{rip} \sim 20$ Gyr
Quintessence ($w > -1$) Slow coasting expansion $\infty$
$w > -1/3$ Recollapse (Big Crunch) Finite

In the standard $\Lambda$CDM scenario, the universe expands forever, exponentially approaching de Sitter space. Galaxies beyond $\sim 5\ \text{Gpc}$ are already receding faster than light (outside our Hubble sphere, not the observable universe) and are becoming permanently inaccessible.